Disney Goes Dark on DirecTV in Contract Fight Over Fees for ESPN, ABC, Disney Channel, Freeform and More (2024)

ESPN and other Disney-owned channels have gone dark on DirecTV after the sides failed to come to terms on a new carriage agreement, a business impasse that reflects the broader economic pain spreading throughout the pay TV sector.

The blackout, coming on the kickoff weekend for ABC’s college football football coverage and a little more than halfway through ESPN’s coverage of the U.S. Open tennis tournament, affects most of DirecTV’s 11 million-plus subscribers in the U.S. DirecTV asserted that Disney made the decision to pull the plug as negotiations were under way. Disney leaders argued they had no choice when the contract expiration hit Sunday afternoon. Disney maintains that DirecTV has balked paying market rates for its channels and won’t wheel and deal on deals involving support for its Disney+, Hulu and ESPN streaming venture.

“While we’re open to offering DirecTV flexibility and terms which we’ve extended to other distributors, we will not enter into an agreement that undervalues our portfolio of television channels and programs. We invest significantly to deliver the No. 1 brands in entertainment, news and sports because that’s what our viewers expect and deserve. We urge DirecTV to do what’s in the best interest of their customers and finalize a deal that would immediately restore our programming,” Disney said in a statement attributed to Disney Entertainment co-chairs Dana Walden and Alan Bergman and ESPN chairman Jimmy Pitaro.

DirecTV put the onus on Disney for demanding higher prices that the satellite TV provider will have to pass down to consumers.

“The Walt Disney Co. is once again refusing any accountability to consumers, distribution partners, and now the American judicial system,” said Rob Thun, chief content officer at DirecTV. “Disney is in the business of creating alternate realities, but this is the real world where we believe you earn your way and must answer for your own actions. They want to continue to chase maximum profits and dominant control at the expense of consumers – making it harder for them to select the shows and sports they want at a reasonable price.”

DirecTV also contends that Disney is using its corporate leverage in a heavy handed way to force DirecTV to waive future claims that “Disney’s behavior is anti-competitive.” That’s a regulatory buzzword designed to pique the interest of D.C. watchdogs in this now highly public business dispute. Disney and its two large partners in the Venu streaming sports bundle venture — Warner Bros. Discovery and Fox Corp. — are already in the thick of litigation over the proposed sports service. A judge earlier this month issued a temporary injunction blocking the service from launching amid antitrust claims made by independent sports outfit Fubo in a federal lawsuit filed in February.

In its lengthy press statement on Sunday, DirecTV flatly stated: “Disney demanded that to reach any licensing agreement or to extend access to its programming, DirecTV must agree to waive all claims that Disney’s behavior is anti-competitive. Moreover, any future lawsuits resulting from DirecTV/Disney licensing agreements would be adjudicated in California – and not New York – because – as Disney counsel specifically stated – SDNY Judge Garnett “didn’t understand the issues” when granting a preliminary injunction against Disney’s Venu Sports. Disney’s last-minute demands to foreclose upon any legal accountability for its growing pattern of anti-competitive actions should be troubling to all pro-consumer advocacy groups, regulators, and Department of Justice attorneys alike.”

Disney and DirecTV have been in tense carriage renewal negotiations for months. Disney had hoped to implement a sales agreement with DirecTV to support the Disney+ and Hulu streaming bundle that is the biggest corporate priority at present for the Mouse House. Disney worked in such terms into its hard-fought pact that came together this time last year with Charter Communications after a 12-day blackout.

DirecTV, like other MVPDs, is facing slowing demand for video services as viewers shift to pure-play streaming and ad-supported free options for content that have proliferated in recent years. As such, DirecTV is taking a hard line on fee increases for channels that are seeing declining linear viewership. Disney’s focus on launching a stand-alone streaming option for ESPN — one of the longtime pillars of the cable TV bundle — next year gives DirecTV little incentive to pay more for the service.

Unlike traditional cable operators, the satellite-delivered DirecTV is not optimal for also providing subscribers with high-speed broadband service. With the Charter deal, Disney pays the cable giant a fee of some kind every time a subscriber signs up through the Charter Spectrum platform, where Disney+ and Hulu are featured as add-on options. DirecTV has far less incentive to help Disney pitch its streaming bundle to subscribers.

DirecTV has pushed its programming partners for greater flexibility in creating smaller, lower-cost channel bundles. ESPN and other sports channels are among the biggest drivers of annual programming cost increases for MVPDs such as DirecTV. Disney counters that the cost of sports rights are going up, not down (see: last month’s 11-year, $76 billion NBA TV rights deal) and that it has been open to new options, apropos of the deal that ended the Charter Communications standoff.

DirecTV’s Thun directly cited Disney’s strategic shift to direct-to-consumer platforms as a factor in the negotiations. “Consumer frustration is at an all-time high as Disney shifts its best producers, most innovative shows, top teams, conferences, and entire leagues to their direct-to-consumer services while making customers pay more than once for the same programming on multiple Disney platforms,” Thun asserted in a statement.

DirecTV’s statement also cited the trend that Wall Street media industry analysts call “leakage,” or the rerouting of high-end content to Disney+ and Hulu that once went exclusively to ABC and linear cable channels.

“Disney’s top studio producers and most innovative series are shifting exclusively to or preferentially appearing first on their streaming products as they take revenue from pay TV, one of its top revenue sources, to invest in quality programming that runs exclusively on its own platforms. For example, Disney’s best programming, like “The Bear” and “Only Murders in the Building,” are exclusive to Hulu, and “Shogun” runs first on Hulu instead of pay TV,” DirecTV stated. “Meanwhile, Disney fills its ABC broadcast network airtime with cheap-to-produce primetime gameshows, unscripted spinoffs, old former ABC hits, or simulcast content from other Disney-owned channels like ESPN while demanding ever-increasing prices from distributors and ultimately consumers.”

The blackout came around 4 p.m. PT Sunday, about an hour before ABC began its live coverage the highly anticipated 2024 season kickoff college football game between the USC Trojans and Louisiana State University Tigers in Las Vegas.